Final words

The reasoning for my choice of words is not based on the insight I gained of architecture through these words.

The word Hybrid has given me a clearer understanding of contemporary architecture in terms of its fascination with continuous and flexible surface. As explained in earlier writings I was confounded by the fervor that critiques of project took in terms of rationalizing connections and space with continuous surfaces. The assumption is that this physical continuity permits flexibility of use, a factor in today’s discussion that is extremely pertinent when it comes to limited resources and with cities’ estimated growth. I suppose the question that this word has left me asking is, if this vocabulary in contemporary architecture that we see rationalizing flexibility is simply a formal move. Does it really have the capacity for change? Does the articulation of a “smart surface” really define new functions that can change over time? In this critical moment and future of architecture I appreciate the effort in the field.

For a word that I disdained in terms of describing the organization of cities, I have come to value the word fabric in another light. It has shown me that by understanding the factors that organize space in our cities, it can be fundamental to the flexibility that hybrid strives for. Hertzberger describes the structure of cities as the basis for the capacity of buildings to accommodate difference over time. For him the weft of fabric has the ability to express the cultural diversity and needs of society. Can we view this weft in terms of façade and skinning of this structure? Can a strong bone structure, carry the “dress” of the time? How related is this apparel to the apparel that we has humans wear daily. This brings to light another question; the role of fashion and style in the profession. The relevance of fashion and architecture is a strong one. If we look at our clothing as the closest layer of shelter to our bodies, it seems evident that an understanding of the relationship between clothing and body can enlighten the relationship of the larger scale of building to man. Corbusier was aware of this with his “Man is a measure of all things”. In another sense, architecture can also look towards fashion in terms of its fascinating ability to enrapture all audiences. The seduction of the fashion industry is one that some would say has more influence over man’s decision than his own morals. Take for example the fundraising Live Strong bracelets that Lance Armstrong founded in order to make “cancer a national priority”. A few years back I found these accessories to fashion on every other person walking the streets of Boston. Acquaintances of mine who had never contributed to a charity were buying bunches of bracelets for friends and relatives to be part of a national phenomenon of wearing a “sweet” yellow band. How can architecture tap into this force to motivate society as a collective towards social responsibility? A study of fashion may have these answers.

Break the rules…one more word.

Systems. Not a day goes by that I do not consider this word. System morphed from an understanding of building components to a comprehension of all thoughts and beliefs as interconnected. I find that any word in our list can relate back to another. No kidding, they all originated in one place. Get the manual.”